Mehr Details
SMALL MOLECULE CONTRACT MANUFACTURING SERVICES
Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH · Braunschweig · Niedersachsen · Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (Bund)
🎯 Persönlicher Treffer-Check
Wie viele Gesundheitswesen & Medizintechnik-Ausschreibungen in Niedersachsen passen zu Ihrem Unternehmen?
30 Sekunden, keine Anmeldung — wir zeigen Ihnen live, wie viele relevante Vergaben es zuletzt gab.
Passende Ausschreibungen in „Gesundheitswesen & Medizintechnik" automatisch erhalten
14 Tage voller Zugang gratis — tägliche Alerts + KI-Eignungsanalyse · keine Kreditkarte · danach kostenfrei weiter
Vergabe-Ergebnis
-
Los 1 VergebenSmall Molecule Contract Manufacturing Services🏆 Ardena Holding N.V. · Mariakerke
- Ardena Holding N.V. · Mariakerke
Hinweis: Nicht alle Kerndaten wurden publiziert — die Vergabestelle hat diese Bekanntmachung ohne Vertragswert veröffentlicht.
Bieter-Übersicht: 3 Angebote eingegangen, davon 1 Auftragnehmer namentlich publiziert: Ardena Holding N.V.. Die übrigen 2 Angebote stammen von unterlegenen Bietern — diese werden in deutschen Vergabeergebnissen üblicherweise nicht namentlich genannt.
Beschreibung
The headline objectives of the present manufacturing project are the use of the deliverables in GLP compliant preclinical toxicology and safety pharmacology studies as well as a phase 1 first-in-human clinical trial. The objective of the project is to manufacture two alternative pharmaceutical dosage forms, sterile liquid and semi-solid, to enable dosing as i.v. infusion and topical administration, respectively. This solely relates to current lack of clinical target validation and the requirement to ready the technology for proof-of-mechanism in systemic versus skin administration. We are targeting a virulence factor of S. aureus that may cause pulmonary or dermal infections. HZI wishes to commission the following activities under Master Service Agreement to a suited contractor. A Go/ NoGo milestone is set after scope 1 while the tendering process and resulting contract shall comprise SCOPE1, SCOPE2, and SCOPE3 activities so as to assure these can be offered in the most economical way in terms of price and quality from one legal entity. SCOPE1: process development and non-GMP manufacture of drug substance and injectable drug product to enable preclinical efficacy, pharmacokinetic and explora-tory tox/safety studies in preclinical animal models SCOPE2: process scale up to GMP manufacturing of drug substance and drug product to perform regulatory preclinical tox and safety studies (GLP compliant) as well as a GCP-compliant phase 1 first-in-human clinical trial for the sterile liquid dosage form and infusion administration SCOPE3: development of the semisolid dosage form for preclinical and phase 1 clinical administration via the topical route
Zuschlagskriterien
Wonach der Auftraggeber das wirtschaftlichste Angebot ermittelt.
-
Weighting (exact percentage): 35 35 %Qualität
Submission of a Project Schedule Concept Requirement and Evaluation Bidders are requested to submit a detailed Project Schedule covering the following aspects: • time planning • work packages/tasks; major deliverables • regulatory support • client communication The concept will be evaluated according to the following criteria: • completeness and depth of detail • quality of the proposed measures • conformity with quality requirements and relevant regulations Formal requirements: minimum 5, maximum 30 pages (excluding table of contents and cover page) Time planning (30 points) 25 - 30 points Very good Conclusive, realistic and flexible planning with sensible milestones and buffer times. 17 - 24 points Satisfactory Basic scheduling with minor ambiguities or insufficient adaptability. 0 - 16 points Poor Unclear, unrealistic planning without buffer times and dependencies. Project structure & tasks (30 points) 25 - 30 points Very good Clear, logical distribution of tasks with sensibly linked deliverables. 17 - 24 points Satisfactory Basic structure in place, but with ambiguities in tasks or dependencies. 0 - 16 points Poor Illogical, incomplete task structure with missing deliverables. Regulatory support (20 points) 16-20 points Very good Support with IMPD writing (DS&DP sections) 8-15 points Satisfactory Support in answering regulatory questions (e.g. analytical methods) 0-7 points Poor Little to no support Client communication (20 points) 16 - 20 points Very good Clear reporting channels and communication structures with systematic documentation. 8 - 15 points Satisfactory Communication available, but not always clear or consistent. 0 - 7 points Poor Missing or inadequate communication structures and reporting channels. Overall rating (100 points) - Coherent and comprehensive concept that meets high standards. - Solid planning with optimization potential in individual areas. - Incomplete or impracticable concept with unfulfilled requirements. Quality evaluation The criterion "quality" is evaluated based on the following documents: B_02_Submission of a Project Schedule B_03_Submission of a manufacturing quality concept A maximum of 100 points can be achieved for the Project Schedule, representing a maximum of 35% of the quality score. Formula (quality per concept) = 35 * (bidder´s concept / 100)
-
Weighting (exact percentage): 35 35 %Qualität
Submission of a manufacturing quality concept Bidders are requested to submit a manufacturing quality concept covering the following aspects: • manufacturing track record (previous projects can be used as examples) • manufacturing sites, technical equipment and manufacturing processes • staff qualification and training • quality management measures The concept is evaluated according to the following criteria: • completeness and depth of detail • quality of the proposed measures • conformity with quality requirements and relevant regulations Formal requirements: minimum 4, maximum 10 pages (excluding table of contents and cover page) Evaluation scheme: manufacturing track record (25 points) 20 - 25 points Very good Coherent, detailed and methodical approach; successful production implementation proven through quality assured implementation. (Refer to projects already completed) 12 - 19 points Satisfactory Solid approach, but not consistently convincing; track record in manufacturing partly recognizable, but not specific enough. 0 - 11 points Poor Inadequate approach, vague description, no realistic implementation, no visible track record in manufacturing. manufacturing sites, technical equipment and manufacturing processes (25 points) 20 - 25 points Very good State-of-the-art technology, regularly maintained and innovative systems 12 - 19 points Satisfactory Solid equipment, functional and typical industry standard 0 - 11 points Poor Outdated or limited equipment, occasional failures Staff qualification and training (25 points) 20 - 25 points Very good Highly qualified and specialized staff with many years of experience 12 - 19 points Satisfactory Expert staff with solid training and relevant experience 0 - 11 points Poor Limited specialist knowledge or lack of experience in specific areas Quality management measures (25 points) 20 - 25 points Very good Convincing, consistent, modern quality management concept 12 - 19 points Satisfactory Quality concept available but incomplete 0 - 11 points Poor Not available. Overall rating (100 points) - Coherent and comprehensive concept that meets high standards. - Solid planning with optimization potential in individual areas. - Incomplete or impracticable concept with unfulfilled requirements. A maximum of 100 points can be achieved for the manufacturing quality concept, representing a maximum of 35% of the quality score. Formula (quality per concept) = 35 * (bidder´s concept / 100) *** Overall result The overall result is calculated from the composition of all points achieved for the individual award criteria. The contract will be awarded to the highest score bid.
-
Weighting (exact percentage): 30 30 %Preis
Evaluation of price The criterion "price" is evaluated on the basis of the following points. The most favourable offer (lowest price) receives a score of 30. The prices of the other offers receive the score depending on the most favourable offer of the A_03_Price Schedule.xlsx. Formula (price) = 30 * (most favourable offer / offer under consideration)
Quelle: Bekanntmachung (eForms) — Gewichtung wie vom Auftraggeber veröffentlicht.
Vergabe- & Vertragsbedingungen
Wichtige Bedingungen für Angebot und Ausführung — wie vom Auftraggeber bekannt gemacht.
Hinweise zur Nachprüfung & Rügepflicht
1) A review procedure before the Public Procurement Tribunal is inadmissible pursuant to Section 160 (3) Sentence 1 No. 4 ARC if more than 15 calendar days have elapsed since receipt of the contracting authority's notification that it does not intend to remedy a complaint. 2) In particular, Section 160 (3) Sentence 1 Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of the ARC and Section 134 (2) of the ARC shall be observed. 3) The period for asserting the invalidity of the contract pursuant to Section 135 of the ARC ends no later than 30 calendar days after publication of the notice of award procedures in the Official Journal of the European Union; see Section 135(2), second sentence, of the ARC.
Quelle: Bekanntmachung (eForms). Maßgeblich sind die vollständigen Vergabeunterlagen.
Eingegangene Angebote
Welcher Bieter den Zuschlag erhalten hat, ist im Vergabeergebnis nicht aufgeführt — siehe Vergabe-Status in der Sidebar.
Verfahrensverlauf
📅 .icsVollständige Historie dieses Vergabeverfahrens — alle Phasen und Veröffentlichungen.
-
Ausschreibung
Angebote werden eingeholt
1 Veröffentlichung
-
Vergabeergebnis Sie sind hier
Auftrag wurde zugeschlagen · 50 Tage nach Fristende
Auftragnehmer Ardena Holding N.V.1 Veröffentlichung
- 07.05.2025 Original-Veröffentlichung aktuell
Watchlist buchen →Nächste Ausschreibung bei Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschu… nicht verpassen?
Auftraggeber-Alert ab 9 €/Mo — tägliche Email sobald etwas ausgeschrieben wird.
Preiseinschätzung
Basierend auf 171 vergleichbaren Vergabeergebnissen:
Statistische Auswertung öffentlicher Zuschlagswerte. Keine Preisempfehlung.
Ähnliche Ausschreibungen
📬
Passende Ausschreibungen automatisch finden
14 Tage volle KI-Analyse + tägliche Alerts gratis testen — keine Kreditkarte, danach kostenfrei weiter.
💡 Mehr als wöchentlich? Watchlist ab 9 €/Mo: täglich + Frist-Reminder + Zuschlag-Info →
Personalisiertes Suchprofil einrichten → · Für Einkaufsabteilungen: Rechnung per Überweisung →