Mehr Details
Feedbox 10 and 50 for SIS100
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH · Darmstadt · Hessen · Öffentliches Unternehmen (Bund)
🎯 Persönlicher Treffer-Check
Wie viele Verteidigung & Sicherheit-Ausschreibungen in Hessen passen zu Ihrem Unternehmen?
30 Sekunden, keine Anmeldung — wir zeigen Ihnen live, wie viele relevante Vergaben es zuletzt gab.
Passende Ausschreibungen in „Verteidigung & Sicherheit" automatisch erhalten
14 Tage voller Zugang gratis — tägliche Alerts + KI-Eignungsanalyse · keine Kreditkarte · danach kostenfrei weiter
Vergabe-Ergebnis
-
Los 1 VergebenFeedbox 10 and 50 for SIS100🏆 KrioSystem Sp. z.o.o. · Wroclaw
- KrioSystem Sp. z.o.o. · Wroclaw
Bieter-Übersicht: 2 Angebote eingegangen, davon 1 Auftragnehmer namentlich publiziert: KrioSystem Sp. z.o.o.. Die übrigen 1 Angebote stammen von unterlegenen Bietern — diese werden in deutschen Vergabeergebnissen üblicherweise nicht namentlich genannt.
Beschreibung
The SIS100 Feed Box system is part of local cryogenics system for the SIS100 synchrotron at FAIR. The Feed Box system distributes the cooling power to the SIS100 magnets and Current Lead Boxes by flow of cold helium in different thermodynamic states, including liquid, vapor, supercritical and cold gas for thermal shielding of the low temperature circuits, including a phase separator with a sub-cooler (PED, cat 4) and ca. 30 cold valves (DN6- DN100).
Weitere Pflichtangaben aus der Bekanntmachung
- Sonstige Umwelt-Kriterien
Zuschlagskriterien
Wonach der Auftraggeber das wirtschaftlichste Angebot ermittelt.
-
Price 40 Pkt.Preis
Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode"
-
Schedule 27 Pkt.Qualität
It is particularly important to the client that the bidder provides a schedule for planning, production, delivery and installation that is comprehensible to the client. A binding commitment to adhere to the deadlines specified in the attached delivery schedule will be viewed positively. Earlier deadlines will be viewed particularly positively. The project planning must take into account an appropriate amount of time for the design phase to allow for sufficient communication and involvement of the client. In addition, the bidder's approach in the event of delays in delivery and performance by subcontractors will be evaluated. The bidder should describe how sufficient communication and the involvement of the client will be ensured during the model adaptation phase.
-
Quality of the offer & presentation 15 Pkt.Qualität
It is particularly important to the client that an understanding of the problem is evident. The proposed solutions are presented and explained as being effective. A high level of detail in the proposed solutions is to be viewed positively. The tender documents must allow conclusions to be drawn regarding compliance with the specifications.
-
Quality assurance, communication and documentation 9 Pkt.Qualität
It is particularly important to the client that the bidder pursues a coherent communication concept that ensures that the project progress can be controlled effectively and efficiently and that the client is involved in the sub-processes (e.g. regular coordination meetings, video conferences, reports, well-defined group of participants). Furthermore, the bidder should present a concept for internal quality assurance (e.g. incoming goods inspection, standards applied, etc.)
-
Technical design & quality 9 Pkt.Qualität
It is particularly important to the client that the solution offered fully meets the specifications and explains how the specified parameters will be achieved. Furthermore, it will be viewed positively if the solution offered offers technical advantages over the specifications. The key challenges have been identified and effective solutions have been proposed.
Quelle: Bekanntmachung (eForms) — Gewichtung wie vom Auftraggeber veröffentlicht.
Vergabe- & Vertragsbedingungen
Wichtige Bedingungen für Angebot und Ausführung — wie vom Auftraggeber bekannt gemacht.
Hinweise zur Nachprüfung & Rügepflicht
Candidate/ Bidder is requested to clearly identify those sections of the participa-tion application (and eventually of the tender, if applicable) that contain a trade or business secret. If Bidder fails to do so, the Public Procurement Tribunal may, in the case of a review procedure, assume that Bidder has agreed to have these documents inspected (§165 para. 3 GWB). As Awarding Authority, FAIR is obliged to make the tender file available to the Public Procurement Tribunal immediately when initiating a review procedure (§ 163 para. 2 cl. 3 GWB). Candidates/ Bidders have a right to expect the contracting authority's compliance with the Bidder-protecting provisions re: the tender procedure (§ 97 para. 6 GWB). If Candidate/ Bidder interested in the contract considers that Bidder's rights have been infringed through failure to comply with award regulations, the infringement must be reported to FAIR within ten calendar days (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 1 GWB). Infringements identifiable on the basis of the announcement or the award doc-uments must be asserted against FAIR within the deadline for submission of ap-plications (or tenders) specified in the announcement (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs Candidate/ Bidder that FAIR is unwilling to redress its complaint, it is possible to file an appeal for review with the aforementioned Public Procure-ment Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the notification (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 4 GWB). Bidders whose tenders are not to be considered for the award will be informed prior to the award according to § 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after this information has been sent by FAIR. In the case of trans-mission by fax or electronic means, this period shall be ten calendar days. It commences on the day after dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this peri-od has expired, a surcharge is possible, even if the deadline is not passed accord-ing to § 160 para. 3 GWB. An application for review would therefore have to be delivered to FAIR by the Public Procurement Tribunal before the expiry of the deadline according to § 134 GWB in order to prevent a surcharge. According to § 135 para. 1 and 2 GWB, the ineffectiveness of a commission can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 cal-endar days of the conclusion of the contract but not later than six months after the conclusion of the contract. If the contracting entity has published the award in Official Journal of the European Union, the period unenforceability shall end 30 calendar days after announcement of the publication of the award in Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection
Quelle: Bekanntmachung (eForms). Maßgeblich sind die vollständigen Vergabeunterlagen.
Eingegangene Angebote
Welcher Bieter den Zuschlag erhalten hat, ist im Vergabeergebnis nicht aufgeführt — siehe Vergabe-Status in der Sidebar.
Preiseinschätzung
Basierend auf 23 vergleichbaren Vergabeergebnissen:
Statistische Auswertung öffentlicher Zuschlagswerte. Keine Preisempfehlung.
Ähnliche Ausschreibungen
📬
Passende Ausschreibungen automatisch finden
14 Tage volle KI-Analyse + tägliche Alerts gratis testen — keine Kreditkarte, danach kostenfrei weiter.
💡 Mehr als wöchentlich? Watchlist ab 9 €/Mo: täglich + Frist-Reminder + Zuschlag-Info →
Personalisiertes Suchprofil einrichten → · Für Einkaufsabteilungen: Rechnung per Überweisung →