Mehr Details
Flip Chip Die Bonder
FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH · Darmstadt · Hessen · Öffentliches Unternehmen (Bund)
Vergabe-Ergebnis
-
Los 1 VergebenFlip Chip Die Bonder🏆 Finetech GmbH & Co. KG · Berlin
- Finetech GmbH & Co. KG · Berlin
Das Wichtigste auf einen Blick
KI-generiert- Beschaffung eines Flip Chip Die Bonder für die Halbleiterbestückung.
- Das Gerät muss Chips mit mikrometergenauer Präzision platzieren können.
- Unterstützung verschiedener Verbindungstechnologien wie Löten, thermisches Bonden und leitfähiges Kleben ist erforderlich.
- Der Auftraggeber ist die FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH in Darmstadt.
KI-generierte Zusammenfassung der Bekanntmachung (KI-Transparenz) — maßgeblich ist die Original-Bekanntmachung.
Beschreibung
In flip-chip assembly, a semiconductor chip is electrically connected directly underside to a sensor via contact bumps. This requires a flip-chip die bonder, which places the chips flipped on the sensors with micrometer precision and enables various bonding technologies such as soldering, thermal bonding, and conductive adhesive bonding.
🎯 Persönlicher Treffer-Check
Wie viele Gesundheitswesen & Medizintechnik-Ausschreibungen in Hessen passen zu Ihrem Unternehmen?
30 Sekunden, keine Anmeldung — wir zeigen Ihnen live, wie viele relevante Vergaben es zuletzt gab.
Passende Ausschreibungen in „Gesundheitswesen & Medizintechnik" automatisch erhalten
14 Tage voller Zugang gratis — tägliche Alerts + KI-Eignungsanalyse · keine Kreditkarte · danach kostenfrei weiter
Weitere Pflichtangaben aus der Bekanntmachung
- Sonstige Umwelt-Kriterien
Zuschlagskriterien
Wonach der Auftraggeber das wirtschaftlichste Angebot ermittelt.
-
Price 40 Pkt.Preis
Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode"
-
Delivery time, installation and training 18 Pkt.Qualität
"The assessment focuses on the transparency and plausibility of the quoted delivery time, installation, and training. It is particularly important to the client that the delivery time, installation period, and training period specified by the client be confirmed. Shorter, plausibly presented timeframes (delivery time, installation period, and training period) will be evaluated positively. Longer timeframes (delivery time, installation period, and training period) will receive a correspondingly lower score, down to 0 points. Furthermore, the bidder"s description of the measures to be taken in the event of impending delivery delays will be evaluated."
-
Quality Assurance, Acceptance Testing, and Documentation 15 Pkt.Qualität
"The evaluation focuses on the completeness, traceability, and technical quality of the quality assurance description as well as the technical documentation. The decisive factor is the extent to which the bidder demonstrates that the required quality is ensured, that compliance with the technical requirements is verified through appropriate testing and acceptance procedures, and that the results are documented in a traceable manner. A positive evaluation is given in particular for a clear, complete, and consistent description of the quality assurance measures, the testing and acceptance procedures, and the intended documentation. Bids will receive a lower score if their explanations remain too general, fail to describe essential elements of the testing and documentation concept in sufficient detail, or leave doubts regarding the reliability of the quality assurance and verification process. Evidence of examples of acceptance tests and documentation."
-
Repair Services and Sustainability 15 Pkt.Qualität
The evaluation focuses on the availability of spare parts and on site services, preferably for ten years, service response within 48 h. Availability of spare parts longer than 10 years and service response shorter than 48 h will be evaluated positively. Shorter Availability and longer response time will receive a lower score.
-
Completeness and Quality of the Bid Documents 12 Pkt.Qualität
"Under this award criterion, an assessment is made of the extent to which the bid documents demonstrate that the proposed system fully meets the technical, qualitative, and functional requirements specified in the procurement documents. In particular, it is important to the contracting authority that the bid clearly shows how the proposed solution fully complies with the order specification. A positive evaluation is given, in particular, for a clearly structured, technically precise, and consistent description of the system configuration and quality assurance. Low scores will be awarded to bids whose documentation is incomplete, contains only general or unreliable statements, or fails to describe the technical implementation and acceptance testing in sufficient detail."
Quelle: Bekanntmachung (eForms) — Gewichtung wie vom Auftraggeber veröffentlicht.
Vergabe- & Vertragsbedingungen
Wichtige Bedingungen für Angebot und Ausführung — wie vom Auftraggeber bekannt gemacht.
Hinweise zur Nachprüfung & Rügepflicht
The competent investigating authority is as follows Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemombler Str. 76 D-53123 Bonn, Germany Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Web: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html The applicant is requested to clearly identify those parts of the request to participate (and any subsequent bid) containing company/business secrets. If this does not happen, the public procurement tribunal will assume consent to inspect the documents as required in the case of carrying out a review procedure (Section 165 (3) Act against Restraints of Competition (Competition Act - GWB)). As the awarding authority, FAIR is required to provide the public procurement tribunal with immediate access to the files when a review procedure is initiated (Section 163 (2) sentence 3 GWB). Applicants/bidders have the right to demand that the Contracting authority comply with the provisions on the award procedure protecting bidders (Section 97 (6) GWB). Applicants/bidders with an interest in the public contract who believe their rights have been violated by non-compliance with the provisions governing the awarding of public contracts, must raise an objection about the violation to FAIR within ten calendar days (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 1 GWB). Violations known from the tender notice or tender documents must be claimed vis-a-vis FAIR before the time limit given for submission of applications (offers) (Section 160 (3) 1 No. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs the applicant/bidder that it is unwilling to redress the objection, an application for review may then be filed with the public procurement tribunal above within 15 days of receipt of the notification (Section 160 (3) sentence 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose bids are not to be considered for the award of the contract will be notified before the awarding of the contract pursuant to Section 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after FAIR has sent out this information. This period is ten calendar days when transmission is by fax or email. The period commences on the day following the dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this time period has expired, an award is possible even if a time limit pursuant to Section 160 (3) GWB has yet to expire. Therefore, in order to prevent an award, a request for review needs to have been served upon FAIR by the public procurement tribunal before the expiry of the time limit under Section 134 GWB. Pursuant to Section 135 (1) and (2) GWB, the invalidity of an award can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days from the date on which there was notification on the conclusion of the agreement, though no later than six months after the agreement was concluded. If the Contracting authority published the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, the time limit for claiming ineffectiveness shall expire 30 calendar days after the publication of the tender notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection FAIR Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
Quelle: Bekanntmachung (eForms). Maßgeblich sind die vollständigen Vergabeunterlagen.
Eingegangene Angebote
Dies sind die je Los eingegangenen Angebotswerte. Wer den Zuschlag erhalten hat, steht im Vergabe-Ergebnis oben bzw. im Vergabe-Status (Sidebar) — die einzelnen Angebote sind in der Bekanntmachung jedoch keinem namentlichen Bieter zugeordnet.
Verfahrensverlauf
📅 .icsVollständige Historie dieses Vergabeverfahrens — alle Phasen und Veröffentlichungen.
-
Ausschreibung
Angebote werden eingeholt
1 Veröffentlichung
-
Vergabeergebnis Sie sind hier TED EU
Auftrag wurde zugeschlagen · 7 Tage nach Fristende
Auftragnehmer Finetech GmbH & Co. KGZuschlagswert 234.757 €1 Veröffentlichung
- 29.09.2026 Original-Veröffentlichung · in TED EU + oev aktuell
Watchlist buchen →Nächste Ausschreibung bei FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion … nicht verpassen?
Auftraggeber-Alert ab 9 €/Mo — tägliche Email sobald etwas ausgeschrieben wird.
Ähnliche Ausschreibungen
📬
Passende Ausschreibungen automatisch finden
14 Tage volle KI-Analyse + tägliche Alerts gratis testen — keine Kreditkarte, danach kostenfrei weiter.
💡 Mehr als wöchentlich? Watchlist ab 9 €/Mo: täglich + Frist-Reminder + Zuschlag-Info →
Personalisiertes Suchprofil einrichten → · Für Einkaufsabteilungen: Rechnung per Überweisung →